Telugu, the pioneer of Dravidian Family-
Latest observations of Afro Asiatic Linguistics
-Dr. G. V. Purnachand
My paper published in ITIHAS - journal of the
A.P. State archives and research institute, vol. 34(2008jan-dec)2011
The 21st century is the time of great Comparative Linguistics, a
study of the Afro-Asiatic and Dravidian families, discussing their locations,
origins and migrations, sub-groupings and characteristics. Research in
comparative Linguistics gained new dimensions and relates Dravidian Languages
with Saharan, Sumerian, Elamite etc.
The goal of research is to reconstruct the parent of the
contemporary Dravidian Languages from their shared native words and grammatical
features, which show regular patterns of correspondence across languages. The
scientifically reconstructed parent is the proto-Language called
Proto-Dravidian.
The Dravidian Languages are mainly spoken in southern, Eastern
and Central India as well as certain areas in North Eastern Sri Lanka,
Pakistan, Nepal, Bangladesh, parts of Afghanistan and Iran, and in overseas
such as the UK, US, Canada, Malaysia and Singapore. They are numbered around 85
languages spoken by about 200 millions of people. Written Evidences are
available from 6th century BC onwards regarding the existence of theses
languages, though their ancestry goes back to many Centuries before(1)
Early migrations and formation of language
groups
Edo Nyland proposed one
Hypothesis that the highly developed languages on earth might have been
developed from the original Saharan Language, during the Neolithic Age. In his
view, the ancient and oldest Saharan has remained relatively unchanged and
stable and is still spoken as Dravidian in India (170 million speakers), as
Ainu on the island of Hokkaido (18,000 speakers in 2005) and as Basque in
Euskadi, Spain (800,000 speakers in 2005) (2)
It must have been a
calamity of an unprecedented scale, which might drive out a large number of
people from their homes in the once well populated Sahara. Some of the Saharan
tribes migrated and settled along the Atlantic, Mediterranean and shores of
Indian Ocean, in about 10,000 B.C. They had developed excellent skills in boat
building, sailing techniques and star navigation. This specialized knowledge
was carefully guarded by their generations involved.
The appearance of the
Neolithic Culture in Southern India was a continuation from the earlier
Paleolithic culture. Some objects discovered in the prehistoric huts round the
Deccan have their parallel in Pakistan Neolithic cultures of the third
millennium before the establishment of the 2 Indus Civilisation. Indus was a
continuation of the ancestors of the Dravidians in southern India in the second
and first millennia BC(2)
Prof. Nyland said that Major advances in the fields of
agriculture, metallurgy, astronomy etc. caused the female-based religion
weakened and male domination arrived. It might happen in 3,000 BC. in Egypt,
Mesopotamia and Anatolia, and about 1,500 BC in India. Living in New styles,
eating of new food material, and inventing new utilities etc., were adopted.
New comers brought along with them learned priesthoods who proceeded to invert
all aspects of the old religion, society, language, legends etc. (2)
These new professionals for thousands of years have been
creating Languages silently and injected them into each large area and placed
under the control of a king. Sumerian and Acadian Languages in Mesopotamia, Old
Egyptian in Egypt, Sanskrit in India, Hebrew in Palestine, Hittite and Lucian
in Anatolia etc. are the best examples of them. All these were the products of
formulaic distortion and scholarly manipulation of the original Saharan
language.(2)
Telugu Land as the first domiciled region of
Proto Dravidians
The origin of the parent Dravidian Language in India and its
speakers is a question that defies consensus among scholars. The
Proto-Dravidian Language speakers were whether indigenous inhabitants of the
Indian subcontinent or migrants in pre-historic times are also an unanswered
question.
In the absence of
contrary evidence to nativity, leading International Linguist, Prof. Bhadriraju
Krishnamurti stated very clearly that the all the Dravidian Languages were
native to India. In case of their coming from another region in Asia, Africa or
Europe, then their migration must took place much before the arrival of the
speakers of Proto Indo Aryan Language (3)
It is, however, a well-established and well supported hypothesis
that Dravidian speakers must have been widespread throughout India including
the northwest region before the arrival of Indo-European speakers. (4)
Sir Arthur John Evans (1851–1941), an English Archaeologist
stated a Century ago, that Southern India was probably the cradle of the Human
race. Investigations in relation to race show it to be possible. Southern India
was also the passage ground by which the ancient progenitors of Northern
Mediterranean Races proceeded to the parts of Globe which they now inhabit. The
people who have for many ages occupied this portion of peninsula are a great
people influencing the world, not much perhaps by moral and intellectual
attributes but to a great extent by superior physical Qualities (5)
Dr. Asko Parpola (University
of Helsinki) as well as Father Heras (1930), the noted Indus expert Iravatham
Mahadevan and Walter A. Fairservis Jr. and others state that the Indus sign
system represented proto Dravidian Language.
Russian Linguist M.S. Andronov puts the split between Tamil (a
written Southern Dravidian language) and Telugu (a written Central Dravidian
language) at 1,500 BC to 1,000 BC. 3
In this context, the findings of Franklin C. Southworth,
Professor Emeritus of South Asian Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania must
be carefully considered. As far as my knowledge goes, Prof. Franklin C.
Southworth is the First Historian who identified the earliest presence of the
proto Dravidian Culture in Telugu Region and therefore the Telugus owe a
Special gratitude to him.(6)
1. Prof. Southworth identifies late Proto-Dravidian with the
Southern Neolithic culture in the lower Godavari River basin of South Central
India, which first appeared 2,500 BC, based upon its agricultural vocabulary.
2. Languages of all the above three subgroups (North, Central,
Southern Dravidian Languages)are found in eastern central India, in the lower
Godavari River basin, and it would be most economical to assume that
Proto-Dravidian was spoken somewhere in that region.
3. He further states that, Proto-Dravidian may have been spoken
in a wider area, extending perhaps into Central India or the western Deccan,
which are now occupied mainly by Indo–Aryan Languages like Marathi and Hindi.
Furthermore, other forms of early Dravidian – pre-Proto-Dravidian, or other (at
present unknown) branches of Dravidian –may also have existed in these same
areas.
4. The most promising Archaeological Complex which might be
connected with the Dravidian Languages is the South Indian Neolithic Complex,
which made its first appearance in the mid-third millennium BC.
5. The first presence at Gulbarga, Raichur, and Bellary
Districts of Karnataka, and Kurnool District of Andhra Pradesh, and there
after, judge by similarities in pottery styles, house construction, plant
remains, and other features – at a very vast area from the Krishna-Tungabhadra
in the north (or if we include the evidence from Daimabad on the Godavari) to
the Kaveri in the south, and from the Krishna-Godavari mouths in the East to
Dharwar in the West‖ (Sankalia 1977:142).
(Ref: F.C. Southworth, "Proto-Dravidian Agriculture" 2006) (6)
6. Note that the core area is located in the vicinity of the
upper Krishna River, not far from the area assumed on Linguistic grounds to be
the home of Proto-Dravidian.
7. Though the close match between Proto-Dravidian and the
Southern Neolithic may be gratifying to the researcher, in a sense there was no
need to prove that this Archaeological complex is connected to Dravidian, since
there are really no other likely candidates.
8. The Dravidian loanwords in late Vedic Sanskrit may be
explained as the result of northward expansion of Dravidian speakers from the
peninsula.
9. A number of the Sanskrit words attributed to Dravidian are
also represented in the Kafir/Nuristani languages, spoken mainly in what is now
northern Pakistan, and generally regarded as a separate third branch of the
Indo -Iranian family (see Morgenstierne 1973, Degener 2002, Southworth
2005b).While this evidence could potentially push the period of Dravidian-Indo-Aryan
contact back to a pre-Vedic period. (6)
Prof. Southworth suggests a dialogue between Archaeologists and
Historical Linguists. ―If what Linguists say makes sense to Archaeologists—and
I hope this is the case with at least some parts of this paper—then the door is
open for conversations about the ways in which the two disciplines can serve to
support, supplement, and question each other‘s conclusions. If Linguists can
produce rigorous reconstructions which provide close matches to archaeological
findings, then Prehistorians will have more reason to trust Linguistic
reconstructions of more intangible things, such as social structure and
ideology. Such a dialogue may well lead to further refinements in methods of
reconstruction which will produce even better matches with the archaeological
record”(6)
The kinship between Dravidians and
Melano-Africans
Language never colonizes itself and also it doesn‘t extend
itself; Language migrates along with the people-‖says Bernard Sergent. He is a French Historian
and comparative Mythologist. In his book Genèse de L'Inde, Sergent stated that
the Dravidian populations are not autochthonous but of African origin. The
kinship between Dravidians and Melano-Africans is demonstrated by numerous
ethnographic parallels both Linguistic and Cultural, like Existence of
matrilineal filiations in Dravidian country as well as several African People (7)
Afro-Asiatic is a large Language family with the great
diversity. At the same time, linguistic similarities such as vowel changes help
show relationships among languages. The main quality of Afro-Asiatic is that it
cuts across the racial boundaries. (Ref: The Afro-Asiatic Language Family by
Meredith Holt) (8). In African Languages spoken in the entire Sahel belt, from
Sudan to Senegal, numerous semantic and grammatical elements are found which
also exist in Dravidian. The similarity with the Uralic languages (Finnish,
Hungarian, and Samoyedic) is equally pronounced.
Sergent offers the hypothesis that at the dawn of the Neolithic
Revolution, the Dravidians left the Sudan, one band splitting off in Iran to
head north to the Urals, the others entering India and moving south.
Excavations of Jean-Francois Jarrige at Mehrgarh revealed that agriculture is
almost as old in north-western India and the Near East, dating from the eighth
millennium. Bernard Sergent argues 5 that what agricultural
Civilisation started at Mehrgarh, continues without interruption up to Indus.
These findings clearly exhibit that Indus Civilisation belonged to Dravidian
speakers only.
C. A Diop laid the foundations for the modern Afro centric idea
against the earlier euro centric thought of the 20th century. He concludes that
Egypt has played the same role as that of the Greco-Latin civilization played
in the West. The African cultural facts will only find their profound meaning
and their coherence in reference to Egypt. (9)
The presence of the intergenic COII/tRNALys 9-bp deletion in
human mtDNA in 646 individuals from 12 caste and14 tribal populations of South
India and compared them to individuals from Africa, Europe, and Asia. The 9-bp
deletion is observed in four South Indian tribal populations, the Irula,
Yanadi, Siddi, and Maria Gond, and in the Nicobarese. Length polymorphisms of
the 9-bp motif are present in the Santal, Konda Dora, and Jalari, all of whom
live in a circumscribed region on the eastern Indian coast. Phylogenetic
analyses of mtDNA control region sequence from individuals with the 9-bp
deletion indicate that some are likely to be of Asian and African origin,
implying multiple origins of the 9-bp deletion in South India. By this report
we are given to understand that African people were settled in Telugu region
much before the Historical Period. (10)
From Nile to River Krishna
King ―Ka” was a Pre-dynastic pharaoh of Upper Egypt and was the
first and earliest known Egyptian king with a serekh, inscribed on a number of
artifacts. Ka (Sekhem Ka or Ka-Sekhem) ruled over Abydos in the late 32nd or
early 31st century BC, and was buried at Umm el-Qa'ab. His tomb was excavated
in 1902, where burial goods were found with the pharaoh's name on them. 6
The people of “Ka “Dynasty
might have commenced their migration and reached ultimately the Krishna Valley
as observed by Sri Tekumalla Ramachandra Rao, one of our earliest scholars, in
his Article –Akhila Andhravaniki toli rajadhani Srikakulam- Srikakulam the
earliest Capital of entire Andhra Pradesh.”Ka” people established Kakula Dynasty with
kakulam (Present day Srikakulam) as their capital. Srikakulam is situated in
Krishna District in Andhra Pradesh in the mouth of River Krishna. Their
principle Deity was Kakuleswara. They might have spoken proto form of Dravidian
Language that resemble present day Telugu”he said.
In the much later period, Andhra Vishnu, the son of Koundinya Suchandra, defeated this Ka Dynasty
and established his rule. Andhra Vishnu might unite the Telugu and Andhra
Languages and Tribes. Thus the present day Telugu Language would have evolved.
Along with them, the
earliest priests would have migrated and merged with local people (the
“Ka”people), the satapatha Brahmana narrates that
sage Viswamitra cursed and abandoned and they migrated into Andhra region.
Scholars are of the opinion that this event dates to 1200 BC, and those
migrants might have been part of the priests that came down to Krishna valley.
“Andhras were nomads for several centuries.” Says Sri yetukuri Balarama Moorty. He further
states that some tribes (classes) migrated and others who did not want to do so
remained in their older settlements. The tale of sage Apastamba explains that,
some of these Andhra tribes inhabited in the Salvadesa on the banks of Yamuna
River during 700 BC. Apastamba Gruhya Sootras have been widely in practice
among Andhra Brahmin families even today. Andhra Tribes established
relationships with Naga, Yaksha, and Dravida tribes of Vindhya Mountains who
already were living there by that time. (11). The Smarta Brahmins
of Andhra follow Apastamba Smriti or Apastamba Sutra but not the Manusmriti.
Apastamba was one of the earliest lawmakers of south India who lived on the
banks of the River Godavari(12)
Meaning of Ka: “Ka” means "soul" in ancient Egyptian
thought. The name of the king, “Ka”is the symbol for the soul. The dead pharaoh‘s
spirit called his “Ka” was believed to remain with his body and it was thought
that if the corpse did not have proper care, the former Pharaoh would not be
able to carry his Duties. The Ancient Egyptians also believed that the “Ka”was sustained through food and drink
offerings. (13)
Meaning of Kakula: Sri Korada Ramakrishnayya explained the
meaning of Kakula
–Ka+kulam=Black+River=Krishnaveni (14)
“Ka”River: The Afro Asiatic source explains Kakula as “Ka”River. There is a River named Ka (also known
as Gulbin Ka River) in the northern part of Nigeria. Originating in Zamfara
State, it runs some 250 kilometers west into Kebbi State where it joins with
the Sokoto River about 100 km south of Birnin Kebbi, shortly before joining the
Niger River.
Osiris-Ka (7000 B.C): Osiris-Ka was called "The Great
Black". “Ka”denotes the Black
color in both of the Proto afro Asiatic and Dravidian Languages.
Kulam: Database query to Dravidian etymology gave the following
meanings for the word Kulam
Proto-Dravidian: *kU -
pond, vessel; to run, leak from a vessel
Proto-South Dravidian:
*kU lo
Proto-Telugu: *kol-
proto-Kolami-Gadba: kU
lo
In the Online
Dictionary DEDR1828 Kulam appears as river, tank or pond:
Ta: kuḷam tank, reservoir, lake
Ma: kuḷam tank Ka: koḷa, koḷahe, koṇa pond
Tu: kuḷa tank, pond
Te: kolanu, kol ku,
kol kuvu id (VPK) kollu deep pond dug or built near the outlet of a tank, in
which water is collected before supplying it to fields; kollu guṇṭa pond into which water from irrigation wells
is bailed out.
The words ka and kulam can also be found in Afro-asiatic
etymology, Compiled by Alexander Militarev, Olga Stolbova gave the following
meanings:
Proto-Afro-Asiatic:
*kur- Meaning: river, lake
Western Chadic: *kur-
'pond'
East Chadic: *kur-/Vy/
'pond' 1, 'river' 2
Central Cushitic
(Agaw): *kur- 'river'
Low East Cushitic:
*kur- 'rivulet'
Eurasiatic: *küɫä Borean: KVLV
Indo-European: *gʷela- Skt:. k la- pond,
pool. DED(S) 1518.
Altaic: *k li;
Uralic: *kälV Kakula Island in pacific: Just a
five-minute boat ride north of Éfaté Island in the Vanauatu Archipelago, there
lies the uninhabited Kakula Island has been called “The Jewel of the South
Pacific”
Kakula
Port in North of Java: Mohammedan Traveler Ibn Batuta of India 1347 AD was
a travelling on a Chinese junk, which has just come from the port of Kakula,
north of Java and Sumatra and passed by Pangasinan on the way to Canton, China.
(Ref: Urduja -
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia-Ibn Battuta - Research - Urduja in popular
culture - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urduja ) (15)
“Ka” in the word Africa: Gerald Massey, in 1881, derived an etymology
from the Egyptian af-rui-ka, "to turn toward the opening of the “Ka” is the energetic double of every person and
"opening of the Ka" refers to a womb or birthplace. Africa would be,
for the Egyptians, "the birthplace‖ (Ref: Nile Genesis: the opus of Gerald
Massey) (16)
Veneration of Dead: The most original elements of the culture of
southern India have their parallel in Africa. Religious practices of the
Dravidian and the African are alike. In India, the crow is considered a spirit
of the ancestors. Crows also feature in European legends or mythology as
portents (foretoken, Augury) or harbingers (Fore Runners) of death, because of
their dark plumage, unnerving calls, and tendency to eat carrion. They are
commonly thought to circle above scenes of 8 death such as battles. (Ref: Crow
Systematics - Crows and humans - Evolution – Behavior; Wikipedia, the free
encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crow) (17)
Kaaki(crow): Telugu word Kaaki(crow)and proto Afro-Asiatic and Semitic words
resemble in phonological and morphological structures.
Proto-Afro-Asiatic: * ʷar-Meaning: crow (also
'partridge; crane'?)
Semitic: * riʔ- partridge riy- kind of bird ʷariy crane arr-
chicken * a ayr- * ʷVr- 'crow'
Berber: *- rVw-t
'raven'
Low East Cushitic: ur-
'crow' 1, 'kite' 2
High East Cushitic:
ur(an-t)- 'crow': Omotic: * ur- 'crow'
Similar Place Names: El Kurru is the one of the place name of
Napata‘s Kingdom (900-650 B.C.), Which closely resembles the name of an
existent Village in Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh, Yela Kurru was the birth
place of Sri kasinadhuni Nageswara Rao, founder of Andhra Patrika. Yelakurru is
few kilometers away from Srikakulam, the first capital of Ka (Telugu) people.
Ellakaru is another place name in Nellore District, A.P. where the evidence of
Paleolithic and Neolithic occupancies and use of black&redwsare were found.
An Encyclopaedia of Indian Archeology(A. Ghosh-paage 81) gave the details of
theis Ellakaru site.
Many cemeteries in Sudan are characterized by the presence of
some large conical-shaped tombs. They are called as 'Qubba'. In Telugu, the
words Kuppa and Gubba are very nearer structures phonologically and
morphologically to Qubba, denoting the conical or elliptical shape of the
Burials. The earliest surviving example of this type of structure is the Qubbat
al-Sulaybiyya at Samarra which is octagonal. Qubba is a cubic volume covered
with a dome or vault. This roof can be simplified into a truncated octagonal
pyramid carpentry, whose corners support 9 four tubes or pendentives; or a
hemiespheric shape carved in stone, brick or wood; or can be covered with a
polygonal or star dome.
DEDR-1731: Te. Kuppa -heap, pile, collection, assemblage, (MBE 1978, p.
127) heap of dirt, dung heap; guppu to place in heaps or lots; abundance; in
heaps, abundantly;
kopparamu, kopramu increase, rise, swell; kopparincu to
increase, rise, swell; kopparinta
DEDR-1174: Te. Gubaka: knob, boss, stud; gubba id., protuberance, woman's
breast; guburu protuberance; kuppe knob. Konḍa (BB) koparam hump of bullock.
DEDR-1655: Te. koṭika hamlet; guḍi temple; guḍise hut, cottage, hovel. guḍḍī (Ph.) temple, (Tr.) tomb (Voc. 1113). Kui guḍi central room of house, living room.
In the year 1969 Dr. V.V. Krishna Sastry, was deputed by AP
state Archeology, to conduct excavations at Peddabankur in Karimnagar District
The excavations revealed two major phases of human activity. The first phase
was coeval with the Iron Age or the so-called Megalithic Period marked by a
number of elliptical or oval shaped houses and the other one coincide with
Satavahana period.
The above findings are suggestive of the affinity of ancient
Egyptians with proto Dravidians or Proto Telugu People.
Conclusion:
The new researchers of Dravidian Etymology at National or
International level are severely handicapped by the absence of reliable Telugu
Lexicon. They even complain that they are unable to have proper material in
Telugu for research purpose because of this lacking of a Lexicon. The available
DEDR do not have so many Telugu words and meanings in it. The researchers are
compelled to move to Tamil, as the availability of Data is plenty in it. The
researchers often take Tamil as a fore most example and that in turn pushes
back the justified Legacy of Telugu, as the fore runner of the Dravidian
family. It is therefore the immediate Historic need of all those working in
Telugu Linguistics to compile a comprehensive Telugu Lexicon. That alone would
remedy the misgivings and precisely prove that Telugu is the Most ancient
Language in the Dravidian Family.
References & Notes:
1. Dravidian languages
– Wikipedia Article, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dravidian_languages)
2. The origin of
Sumerian- Edo Nyland- Athenaeum Library of Philosophy evans-
experientialism.free webspace.com/ling_sumerian.htm. Edo Nyland is doing
research in the fields of Linguistic Archaeology, is digging artefacts of
Language. In his book Linguistic Archaeology: An Introduction, he lets us take
part in his adventures of recovering stone-age and medieval history by analysis
of language. The efforts of 10 Edo Nyland in translating ancient inscriptions
have resulted in the development of Afro Asiatic Family of Language.
3. The Dravidian Languages: Prof. Bhadriraju
Krishnamurti; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (South Asian edition, 2003.
Prof. Bhadrir ju Kṛṣṇam rti is an eminent
Dravidianist and the most respected Indian Linguist of his generation. He was a
former Vice Chancellor of the Hyderabad Central University and was a professor
of Linguistics at the Dravidian Department of Linguistics at the Osmania
University which he founded. His magnum opus Languages is considered a landmark
volume in the study of Dravidian linguistics. He was a student and a close
associate of Murray Barnson Emeneau
4 "Dravidian Languages."
Encyclopedia Britannica - Online. 5 June 2008)
5. Dravidian India -
T. R. Sesha Iyengar–Asian Educational Services 2001- page 60
6. F.C. Southworth,
"Proto-Dravidian Agriculture" 2006
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/~fsouth/Proto-DravidianAgriculture.pdf F.C.
Southworth - Professor Emeritus of South Asian Linguistics, University of
Pennsylvania. Proto-Dravidian Agriculture, is the paper from the 7th ESCA Round
Table Conference held at Kyoto in June 2005. He is mostly attached to SARVA
(South Asian Residual Vocabulary Assemblage) Project, a research tool in the
form of an online, ongoing etymological dictionary, whose ultimate goal is to
assemble all words showing early language contact among the (known and unknown)
languages of the subcontinent, in order to provide data for the reconstruction
of the history of language contact in the region, from the time of the earliest
knowable South Asian linguistic strata, including inferences regarding the
locations of these strata in time and space.
7. Bernard Sergent
(born in 1946) is a French ancient historian and comparative mythologist. He is
researcher of the CNRS and president of the Société de mythologie française. -
African origin of the Dravidians Excerpts on the origins of the Dravidians,
from Bernard Sergent's Génèse de l'Inde translated by Sunthar Visuvalingam. www.svabhinava.org/.../Sergent-AfroDravidian-frame.php
8. The Afro-Asiatic
Language Family by Meredith Holt, linguistics.byu.edu/classes
9. Prof. Cheikh Anta
Diop; Civilization or Barbarism. Brooklyn, N.Y) Cheikh Anta Diop born in 29
December 1923 in Thieytou, was a historian, anthropologist, physicist, and
politician who studied the human race's origins and pre-colonial African
culture. He is regarded as an important figure in the development of the
Afrocentric viewpoint, in particular for his controversial theory that the
Ancient Egyptians were Black Africans. Cheikh Anta Diop University, in Dakar,
Senegal is named after him.
10. American Journal
Of Physical Anthropology 109:147–158 (1999) ‗Multiple Origins of the mtDNA 9-bp
Deletion‘ in Populations of South India-W.S. WATKINS and others
11. Ancient History of Andhras-By Sri
Yetukoori Balaraama Moorti - Andhrula Samkshipta Charitra-English translation:
PALANA (nparinand@cas.org)(13)
12. Telugu Brahmins-
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telugu_Brahmins, Wikipedia encyclopedia 11
13. Egyptian Pharaohs:
Predynastic Egyptian Journeys 2003
www.phouka.com/pharaoh/pharaoh/dynasties/dyn00/03ka.html -
14. Ref: Krishna zilla
Grama namamulu- Oka Pariseelana: Bharati, Feb. 1984, pp 72)
15. Urduja -
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia-Ibn Battuta - Research - Urduja in Popular
culture - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urduja
16. Nile Genesis: the
opus of Gerald Massey'". Gerald-massey.org.uk gerald-
massey.org.uk/massey/cmc_nile_genesis.htm. Retrieved 2010-05-18.
17. Crow Systematics -
Crows and humans - Evolution – Behavior; Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crow
Excellent effort. In my trips all over the world, I have seen people of even very small countries take pride saying that the world started in their place,the best ruler was from their place etc. I believe that we get into this western thinking that people came from Africa to India or fro Europe.
ReplyDeleteWhy we can not think that world started from here as all the theories whatever we are seeing are conjectures or are filtered through the brains of people who want to see in certain way only or can interpret in that way only due to the strong limitations of understanding others culture. I think the reason that we do not take pride in India is because we are being taught that some body came and conquered us etc even at the earliest period.